On April 14th, 2014, I sent my Grievance against John T. Dierksen to CCA with the following Cover Letter.
Consumer Complaint Agency (CCA) VIA www.consumercomplaintagency.org
1. RE: A Fraudulent Real Estate Scam – Perpetrator: John T. Dierksen, Reagan, Burris, Dierksen, Lamon, Pllc, 401 Main Plaza, Suite 200, New Braunfels, TX 781320 (Phone: 830 625-8026, FAX: 830 625-4433)
I need the CCA's help to encourage the State Bar of Texas to investigate, sanction, and possibly disbar John T. Dierksen. My intention (with CCA's support) is to fully expose John T. Dierksen so that any potential Clients understand that he will conceal documents in barratry against them, work dishonestly with the Plaintiffs’ attorneys to close a fraudulent real estate loan, and withdraw “legal services” without giving proper notice (to try to avoid punishment). I want John T. Dierksen’s prospective Clients to understand that there are Civil and Criminal consequences to participating in dishonest acts - even if the Plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs’ attorney, a Defendant's attorneys, an FDIC Mortgage Lender and a Judge (initially) seem "go along with the fraud."
Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you, Debbie G. Asbury
Consumer Complaint Agency (CCA) VIA www.consumercomplaintagency.org
1. RE: A Fraudulent Real Estate Scam – Perpetrator: John T. Dierksen, Reagan, Burris, Dierksen, Lamon, Pllc, 401 Main Plaza, Suite 200, New Braunfels, TX 781320 (Phone: 830 625-8026, FAX: 830 625-4433)
I need the CCA's help to encourage the State Bar of Texas to investigate, sanction, and possibly disbar John T. Dierksen. My intention (with CCA's support) is to fully expose John T. Dierksen so that any potential Clients understand that he will conceal documents in barratry against them, work dishonestly with the Plaintiffs’ attorneys to close a fraudulent real estate loan, and withdraw “legal services” without giving proper notice (to try to avoid punishment). I want John T. Dierksen’s prospective Clients to understand that there are Civil and Criminal consequences to participating in dishonest acts - even if the Plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs’ attorney, a Defendant's attorneys, an FDIC Mortgage Lender and a Judge (initially) seem "go along with the fraud."
Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you, Debbie G. Asbury
On April 14th, 2014, I sent my Grievance against Jonathan H. Hull to CCA with the following Cover Letter.
Consumer Complaint Agency (CCA) VIA www.consumercomplaintagency.org
1. RE: A Fraudulent Real Estate Scam – Perpetrator: Jonathan H. Hull, Reagan, Burris, Dierksen, Lamon, Pllc, 401 Main Plaza, Suite 200, New Braunfels, TX 781320 (Phone: 830 625-8026, FAX: 830 625-4433 Cell: (830 708-9174).
I need the CCA's help to encourage the State Bar of Texas to investigate, sanction, and possibly disbar Jonathan H. Hull. My intention (with CCA's support) is to fully expose Jonathan H. Hull so that any potential Clients understand that he will conceal documents in barratry against them, work dishonestly with the Plaintiffs’ attorneys to close a fraudulent real estate loan, and withdraw “legal services” without giving proper notice (to try to avoid punishment). I want Jonathan H. Hull’s prospective Clients to understand that there are Civil and Criminal consequences to participating in dishonest acts - even if the Plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs’ attorney, a Defendant's attorneys, an FDIC Mortgage Lender and a Judge (initially) seem "go along with the fraud."
Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you, Debbie G. Asbury
Consumer Complaint Agency (CCA) VIA www.consumercomplaintagency.org
1. RE: A Fraudulent Real Estate Scam – Perpetrator: Jonathan H. Hull, Reagan, Burris, Dierksen, Lamon, Pllc, 401 Main Plaza, Suite 200, New Braunfels, TX 781320 (Phone: 830 625-8026, FAX: 830 625-4433 Cell: (830 708-9174).
I need the CCA's help to encourage the State Bar of Texas to investigate, sanction, and possibly disbar Jonathan H. Hull. My intention (with CCA's support) is to fully expose Jonathan H. Hull so that any potential Clients understand that he will conceal documents in barratry against them, work dishonestly with the Plaintiffs’ attorneys to close a fraudulent real estate loan, and withdraw “legal services” without giving proper notice (to try to avoid punishment). I want Jonathan H. Hull’s prospective Clients to understand that there are Civil and Criminal consequences to participating in dishonest acts - even if the Plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs’ attorney, a Defendant's attorneys, an FDIC Mortgage Lender and a Judge (initially) seem "go along with the fraud."
Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you, Debbie G. Asbury
The Executive Director of BODA, received 100 pages, plus full documentation, of ALL of the barratry, misconduct, and FRAUD that I was confronted with by my own Defense Attys, Jonathan Hull, Bar Card #10253350, and John T. Dierksen. By refusing to assemble a BODA Panel to inquire about the ISSUES OF MY GRIEVANCE, the BODA Chief and the State Bar of Texas are SHIELDING these attorneys from Malpractice Lawsuits! The State Bar of Texas and BODA, fully aware that they have attorneys in Comal County who MAY, IN FACT, deserve to be disbarred, are allowing them to continue to practice.THERE IS CLEAR EVIDENCE OF THEIR FRAUDULENT INTENT to harm TEXAS Taxpaying Citizens by committing FRAUD against me, and also, all of those Home-owners who have obtained or wish to receive low-interest FDIC insured Loans!
By March, 2008, the Butts and Barron Casteel were insisting that I must agree to pay their atty fees for the frivolous Lawsuit, before they would agree to settle with me. I searched for a REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY who would know immediately - that the problem with the Sale of my Home to the Butts was: THE FACT THAT THE BUTTS HAD VERBALLY ALLEGED THERE WERE UNSAFE FOUNDATION PROBLEMS WITH MY HOME - as well as other extensive problems noted on a TREC Report - which I had tried diligently to solve BUT HAD NO WARRANTIES ON - EVEN WARRANTIES PROVIDED TO ME.
With my first retainer paid to my own Malpracticing atty, he told me he would - force the Butts to perform a "Walkthrough," writing down ALL OF THE DEFECTS that they insisted (but never in writing) needed to be DONE for them to buy my home. My malpracticing atty indicated that he would speak to the mother of the Butt's atty, an "old friend of his." If the Butts would not "walkthrough" the house - listing "problems they objected to in writing", then, my own malpracticing atty told me that he would make certain that I was released from the Sales Contract that I had signed with them IN GOOD FAITH in March, 2007.
First, my own malpracticing atty assigned an attorney, Stephanie Bascom, to proceed. But, she left the firm soon after. Then, Jonathan Hull was assigned to the Case. There was finally a "walk-through" in April, 2008. However, before the Butt's atty would provide any information in writing from the Butts on what they considered still required to-be-completed, he absurdly insisted that I must agree to pay his attorney fees for the frivolous Lawsuit!
To read more about FDIC Fraud, PRESS HERE.
§ 1341. Frauds and swindles.
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with, a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), or affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
[Codified to 18 U.S.C. 1341]
[Source: Section 1[1341] of the Act of June 25, 1948 (Pub. L. No. 772; 62 Stat. 763), effective September 1, 1948, as amended by section 34 of the Act of May 24, 1949 (Pub. L. No. 72; 63 Stat. 94), effective May 24, 1949, section 6(j)(11) of the Act of August 12, 1970 (Pub. L. No. 91--375; 84 Stat. 778), effective July 1, 1971; section 961(i) of title IX of the Act of August 9, 1989 (Pub. L. No. 101--73; 103 Stat. 500), effective August 9, 1989; section 2504(h) of title XXV of the Act of November 29, 1990 (Pub. L. No. 101--647; 104 Stat. 4861), effective November 29, 1990; sections 250006, and 330016(1)(H) of titles XXV and XXXIII of the Act of September 13, 1994 (Pub. L. No. 103-322; 108 Stat. 2087 and 2147, respectively), effective September 13, 1994; section 903(a) of title IX of the Act of July 30, 2002 (Pub. L. No. 107--204; 116 Stat. 805), effective July 30, 2002; section 4 of the Act of January 7, 2008 (Pub. L. No. 110--179; 121 Stat. 2551), effective January 7, 2008]
Both malpracticing Attorneys Retained In My Defense, Absurdly Defended That the Plaintiffs’ Lawsuit, Alleging “Lost Rents of $2,100 a month” Were Due Them, Although My Homes’ Home-Owner Association Bylaws Forbid Such Rentals, and HUD Home Loans with Low-Interest were only for Home-Owners, could NOT apply to “Rentals.” Press Here to Read More
Most absurdly, my malpracticing attys were unconcerned that the Butts and their atty had provided, yet a second TREC Home Inspection Report which indicated that NONE of the Repairs noted as necessary to-be-completed from the first one, WERE COMPLETED. I was astonished to understand that my own malpracticing attys actually encouraged me to try to Settle with the Butts then! The TREC Inspection Report had to-be-addressed in full BEFORE THE BUTTS COULD EVEN OBTAIN A CLEAR TITLE and then, possibly qualify for an FDIC Insured Loan! My own malpracticing attys were leading me into a Lawsuit in which I could never be expected to recover from! I indignantly accused them of "working against me." I requested to speak the Butts and their atty, myself, but was denied that. Finally, I persuaded my own malpracticing attys to set up ANOTHER MEDIATION, a last attempt before the HUGE expense of a Jury Trial.
SEE THE FACTS (press here) of the DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL indicate clearly that my own malpracticing attys withdrew from their Duty to Represent me when I insisted that they must follow the terms set by the MEDIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, executed on 10/10/2008.
