TEXAS' Board of Disciplinary Appeals PROHIBITS Texas Grievance Complainants Our Right to DUE PROCESS OF LAW.
  • STAT Purpose
  • UNLAWFUL BAR DUES
  • SUNSET REVIEW 2016
  • Robert A. Black, BODA
  • Christine E. McKeeman
  • Barron Casteel
  • Gary L. Steel
  • BODA EVADES DUE PROCESS
  • Guy Harrison
  • BLATANT FRAUD
  • John T. Dierksen/Jonathan H. Hull
  • Mediation
  • Acie Craig McAda
  • Kevin Butt
  • ACLU, FDIC, HUD Complaints
  • Contact ME
  • sanction

Is the Texas Bar's still demanding compulsory dues for "unified" Bar association membership now unlawful, in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision?

Janus v. AFSCME, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018)
“Janus forbids compelled speech in the form of government-mandated financial support to private organizations. The unified bar is squarely in the cross-hairs.”
https://www.lawliberty.org/2018/12/24/beyond-janus-revisiting-the-unified-bar/?fbclid=IwAR009Ln8msHjVPECGTWrpFTWQKm9lXXhz3kkwz2NYM6tp2171TKcjWjYuZA
​


Picture

Picture

Fleck v. Wetch

Fleck v. Wetch
 Petition granted, judgment vacated and case remanded to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit for further consideration in light of Janus v. State, County, and Municipal Employees on December 3, 2018.
Docket No.
Op. Below
Argument
Opinion
Vote
Author
Term
17-886
8th Cir.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
OT 2018
​

Joe K. Longley, SBOT President 2018-2019, requested an Opinion  - on legality of charging Mandatory Bar Dues  - from Attorney General Ken Paxton on January 22nd., 2019.

SCOTUS

​https://www.lawliberty.org/2018/12/06/after-janus-whats-next/

​Issues: (1) Whether it violates the First Amendment for state law to presume that the petitioner consents to subsidizing non-chargeable speech by the group he is compelled to fund (an “opt-out” rule), as opposed to an “opt-in” rule whereby the petitioner must affirmatively consent to subsidizing such speech; and (2) whether Keller v. State Bar of California and Lathrop v. Donohue should be overruled insofar as they permit the state to force the petitioner to join a trade association he opposes as a condition of earning a living in his chosen profession.
Picture
January 22, 2019 Dear Attorney General Paxton:....  2.Is it constitutional to require Bar members to pay compulsory Bard dues.....that Bar members object to on First Amendment grounds (e.g.free speech, freedom of association), including programs that are not within the regulatory functions of the State Bar?
agpaxton.pdf
File Size: 497 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Picture
Debbie G. Asbury             As an advocate for Abolishing Compulsory State Bar Dues, I presented a Briefing Letter to the A.G.'s Opinion Committee on February 19th, 2019.


kenpaxtonopinioncom2.pdf
File Size: 236 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Picture
Picture
Picture
View More